Lesley McSpadden, right, the mother of 18-year-old Michael Brown, watches as Brown’s father, Michael Brown Sr., holds up a family picture of himself, his son, top left in photo, and a young child during a news conference Monday, Aug. 11, 2014, in Ferguson, Mo. Michael Brown, 18, was shot and killed in a confrontation with police in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, Mo, on Saturday, Aug. 9, 2014.
CLAYTON, Mo. (AP) — The 18-year-old fatally shot by a suburban St. Louis police officer didn’t face any juvenile charges at the time of his death and never was charged with a serious felony such as murder, robbery or burglary, a juvenile court system lawyer said Wednesday.
Those details emerged at a hearing in which two media organizations sought the release of any possible juvenile records for Michael Brown.
Cynthia Harcourt, the St. Louis County juvenile office’s attorney, offered the most specific public details on whether Brown faced legal trouble before his 18th birthday — a subject of intense speculation in a case that has garnered global attention. The 45-minute hearing before a St. Louis County family court judge didn’t reveal whether Brown had ever been charged with lesser offenses as a juvenile.
Juvenile records are confidential in Missouri, but under state law, being charged with certain violent crimes removes those juvenile privacy protections. Police have said Brown had no adult criminal record.
Joe Martineau, an attorney for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, cited an overriding public right to know Brown’s history after his early August shooting death by Ferguson officer Darren Wilson sparked more than a week of sometimes-violent protests and drew international scrutiny.
“There is interest in knowing Michael Brown’s background,” Martineau said. “What we’re asking for here is just verification, one way or the other … We’re acting in a vacuum here.”
Harcourt that “simple curiosity” doesn’t trump the state’s legal interest in protecting minors accused of crimes.
“The court of public opinion does not require the release of juvenile records,” she said.
Brown family attorney Anthony Gray attended the hearing and sat next to Harcourt but did not speak in court. Afterward, he called the requests by the St. Louis newspaper and a northern California online journalist “shameful.”
“The true motivation for the request of the records is character assassination,” he said.
Gray argued that even if Brown did have a brush with the juvenile court system — including for such low-level offenses as truancy — those details are irrelevant to the question of whether Wilson acted with excessive force.
“I don’t know what would be the relevance of that … after this young man was executed in broad daylight,” he said.
The civil lawsuit by Charles C. Johnson of Fresno, California, cites a 1984 Missouri Court of Appeals ruling that allowed the release of the juvenile records of an 18-year-old who was killed by a security guard while shoplifting at a supermarket in 1979.
That man’s mother challenged a trial court’s decision to release the records to defendants who were hoping to determine the 18-year-old’s lost earning capacity.
Johnson is editor-in-chief of the website GotNews.com. He also attended the hearing.
Judge Ellen Levy Siwack did not indicate how long she would take before releasing a ruling.
Also on Wednesday, a grand jury was scheduled to meet for the third time since Brown’s death to consider evidence in a possible criminal case. The police shooting is also being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.
Follow Alan Scher Zagier on Twitter at http://twitter.com/azagier