By Tashi McQueen
AFRO Staff Writer
tmcqueen@afro.com
As federal immigration enforcement activity continues across Washington, D.C., new transparency laws governing how local police interact with federal officers have been extended through November.
As of April 29, the D.C. Council has extended both the Full Accountability in Arrest Reporting Act and the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Act through 225-day temporary legislation. The council passed both the body-worn camera measure and the full accountability legislation on March 31.
The body-worn camera bill was signed into law by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) on April 22 and the full accountability measure enacted without her signature on April 29. Both measures are now in effect through November while permanent legislation remains pending before the council.
Bowser explained why she chose not to sign the full accountability bill in a letter to the council on April 21.
“This is rushed legislation that could impede law enforcement efforts in D.C.,” she wrote. “This measure is more appropriately handled by the Congress of the United States, who has budget and oversight responsibilities for federal policing agencies. This bill does not include any implementation, planning or training period for our officers. This is the recipe for complications for frontline officers and prosecutors.”
This outlook remains consistent with Bowser’s decision to veto the emergency version of the full accountability bill on March 23, which was weeks after the D.C. Council unanimously voted to approve it. Emergency legislation allows a bill to take effect immediately upon the mayor’s signature, or the successful override of a veto, and remain in effect for roughly 90 days.
The council ultimately overrode Bowser’s veto of the full accountability bill on March 31 with a unanimous vote. In the District, a bill requires seven votes to pass and nine votes to override a veto. The measure took immediate effect following the override.
“When federal officers use force in the District of Columbia, victims and their families should not have to guess who was there, who used force, or what happened,” said Robert C. White Jr., (D-At-Large), the bill’s lead sponsor, during the March 31 Council meeting. “Transparency should not be optional when someone’s life is on the line.”
The full accountability law requires MPD officers to fully document serious use-of-force incidents involving federal officers when MPD is present, including recording the federal officer’s name, badge number and agency.
Given the District’s long history of being “tough on crime,” particularly toward Black residents, federal enforcement surges can worsen these disparities and heighten community mistrust.
According to the D.C. Office of Police Complaints, MPD recorded 2,519 use-of-force incidents in 2024, with 89 percent involving Black community members, underscoring persistent racial disparities in policing.
While Bowser vetoed the full accountability bill, she signed the body-worn camera transparency legislation into law on March 23.
“We must have transparency around the federal agencies operating in D.C.,” said Councilwoman Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2), who introduced the bill. “My ‘Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026’ and my ‘Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act’ that the council passed unanimously enhances transparency with use-of-force incidents involving federal agencies by requiring the release of Metropolitan Police Department body-worn camera recordings of federal agencies using force that occur while MPD is present.”
“My bill fosters accountability and builds safer, more collaborative communities,” she added.
The permanent version of Pinto’s legislation was introduced Feb. 25 and remains pending before the council.
With both temporary extensions in place, the measures remain active through at least November, reflecting the Council’s effort to increase transparency and strengthen accountability for federal agencies within its limited authority. The council does not have direct authority over federal agencies.